feature freeze

Dan Meltzer parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com
Mon Feb 16 07:37:58 CET 2009


On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Mark Kretschmann <kretschmann at kde.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Dan Meltzer
> <parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Mark Kretschmann <kretschmann at kde.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Mark Kretschmann <kretschmann at kde.org> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Lydia Pintscher <lydia at kde.org> wrote:
>>>>> Heya :)
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think about a feature freeze in 3 weeks? If this causes
>>>>> problems for anyone please speak up now.
>>>>
>>>> I'm all for it! Except that I would even prefer 2 weeks. That's
>>>> because our feature list is already impressive, but our bugs list is
>>>> daunting, and our regressions are painful. So I think 2 weeks make a
>>>> good compromise.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS:
>>>> We've never been too anal about the freeze. If someone wants to add a
>>>> button here or a mini addition there, we can still talk about it after
>>>> the freeze, IMHO. That makes the "freeze" a lot less scary than it
>>>> could be, I find.
>>>
>>> So, can we get a decision on this? If not, I would simply say "Let's
>>> start to go into feature freeze mode now, without being too anal about
>>> it in the beginning." This would translate directly to: Focus more on
>>> bugs, less on features.
>>
>> I'm fine with 2 or 3 weeks.  The only thing that I know of thats still
>> floating around that might be drop worthy (that we talked about on irc
>> today..) is the acoustic fingerprinting stuff.  If we don't hear back
>> from Soren by next weekend I'd say we could freeze then, if we do hear
>> back I'd like a week or so to see about getting it merged...
>
> TBH, (as I told you already on IRC), I think one has to draw a line
> somewhere, and I do not think that the fingerprinting patch should go
> into 2.1, but rather into 2.2. Several reasons:
>
> 1) Enough features for 2.1. Adding another one means even more bugs to
> fix / watch over.

This contradicts the idea of a feature freeze in 2-3 weeks.
>
> 2) Soren's current status is rather unclear. He got a new job, and he
> may or may not be too busy to finish and maintain the code right now.

Leo has already mentioned that he is willing to maintain the code.
>
> --
> Mark Kretschmann
> Amarok Developer
> www.kde.org - amarok.kde.org
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list