GSoC 2009

[Dan Meltzer]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Casey Link <unnamedrambler at gmail.com> wrote:
>> better various artists handling?
> This is a very important feature, but not a big enough job to warrant
> a GSoC slot, IMHO.
>
>> Is anybody already working on some kind of fingerprinting to
>> complete tags?
> Musicbrainz does this already.. no need for us to reinvent the wheel,
> lets just port the old stuff from 1.4 and improve the UI.

As does lastfm, not sure which we'd rather use... I know the
musicbrainz library had a lot of issues in 1.4, but I don't know if
it's improved or not
>
>
> And as for the DAAP stuff.. I agree with what everyone's said. I just
> threw DAAP out there because i was familiar with it. My point is just
> that Amarok needs to support remote streaming/media server-esque type
> features to remain competitive.
>
> Synchronization and this Remote/Media Server stuff are the most
> crucial features that fit nicely into a GSOC project, again IMHO.
>
> Casey
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>