Multiple Databases [WAS: Re: Junior Job - external MySQL config]
Orville Bennett
illogical1 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 03:45:36 CEST 2009
Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On sekmadienis 30 Rugpjūtis 2009 11:14:33 Seb Ruiz wrote:
>
>>> I'd much rather stick with one database. If we find a better solution
>>> than MySQL, by all means, let's switch over completely.
>> I agree, which is why I haven't raised much of a noise during the
>> whole 2.x development about multi db.
>
> You are forgetting that people might already have a database server in place.
> Since MySQL and PostgreSQL are both free software, not supporting them both
> "by design" will make some people unhappy (esp. since it a feature regression
> from 1.4). People won't switch database servers for Amarok and it is more
93% of users disagree. Statistics don't lie.
> likely they will dump Amarok. On the other hand, you don't have to implement
But on a more serious note, no one needs to switch given how it's
implemented.
For most users they just install amarok, none the wiser about the db.
For those who use a database server, the embedded mysql relieves the
need for configuring another. For those who want a full server, they get
mysqld.
If this is an argument about not wanting to install software to preserve
the purity of a system; I hear the National Socialist party is looking
for a few good men again.
> something you are not interested in, just don't close the doors for somebody
> to come and do it.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
Did I just invoke Hitler? Guess the threads over then.
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list