Release naming

[Lydia Pintscher]

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 20:07, Leo Franchi <lfranchi at kde.org> wrote:
>> Also how do you want to go on with this scheme?
>> I assume we want to stay with 2.x for quite some time so 17 will not
>> be enough.
>> What are we going to name 2.0.1? (if we are going to have it and not
>> go straight to 2.1)
>> Do we just use that album until it is finished and then move on to
>> the next one?
>> What about alpha and beta releases? Stick with Inuit folklore for
>> them?
>
> I think we should stick with the inuit folklore for all pre-2.0
> released, then release with a new splashcreen and new release naming
> scheme all at once (i am talking to someone on #oxygen about getting a
> splashscreen right now).
>
> And 17 should at *least* be enough to get us to 2.1 or 2.2, or until
> we have figured out something better i think, no?

Well yes. But what then?
We might run out of names in the middle of 2.2.x.
We can't just randomly change release name scheme then. We should
settle this now.


Cheers
Lydia

-- 
Lydia Pintscher
Amarok community manager
kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org
claimid.com/nightrose