No subject

Songbird. So I guess a band might have an HTML page they created
specifically for Songbird. Thats not something we could do with
Amarok.

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Nikolaj Hald Nielsen
<nhnfreespirit at gmail.com> wrote:
> I had noticed this out of the corner of my eye a while back. The thing
> is that there is no guarantee that the kinds of actions that we want
> these urls to invoke are compatible as they are likely to be quite
> strongly tied to the overall design of the application.
>
> That, and I really don't have time to go into a serious dialog with
> them at the moment, I have more than enough on my hands and have
> imposed a "no more projects" referendum on myself until all the stuff
> for 2.1 that I am working on is done. If anyone else wants to have a
> talk with them, that is fine with me, and I will of course comment, I
> just cannot be the driving force behind this at the moment.
>
> - Nikolaj
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Dan Meltzer
> <parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Was just browsing songbirds website, and I ran across plans for
>> songbird to also implement their own "url runners"[1]
>>
>> I think it would be intelligent for us to communicate with them and
>> try to standardize on a format (and possibly a protocol?) so that
>> their can be one link to rule them all, rather than hoping sites will
>> add "Amarok" "Songbird" and "blah" "itunes" "Banshee"... links.
>>
>> Nikolaj?
>>
>> [1]http://wiki.songbirdnest.com/Releases/Hendrix/Invoking_Songbird_from_urls
>>
>> Dan,