Post 2.0.0 release plan discussion
Lydia Pintscher
lydia at kde.org
Thu Nov 20 23:13:34 CET 2008
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Seb Ruiz <ruiz at kde.org> wrote:
> We've always had a rather lax idea of "freeze", especially during the
> 1.3/1.4 series, and I think this added a positive contribution to the
> huge development we saw then. I feel that our post 2.0 freeze, whilst
> necessary to a great degree, restricted a lot of developers and their
> coding habits (although git has alieved lots of these). For this
> reason I think we should drop from freeze threat level red to freeze
> threat level yellow - allow new features and strings, provided they
> are small enough and don't include large risky changes.
Yes agreed. When 2.0 is finally out of the door I think that is
generally a good idea and we will go back to shorter freezes.
But I think we all agree that we would have never gotten 2.0 out of
the door if not for a strict freeze.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher
Amarok community manager
kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org
claimid.com/nightrose
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list