A better default scoring script for Amarok 2

[Leo Franchi]

On 14 Dec 2008, at 17:42, Jeff Mitchell wrote:

> Casey Link wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Dan Meltzer
>> <parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Karthik Periagaram
>>> <karthikp at gatech.edu> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Me again. Here are the three changes that need to be made to the  
>>>> codebase to
>>>> improve the default scoring algorithm.
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I support this change for 2.1 (I was the one who told him to mail it
>>> in originally).
>>>
>>> I think this is a nicer algorithym, but I'm not quite sure whether  
>>> or
>>> not the masses will be up in arms if their scoring algorthym changes
>>> (will they even notice?)
>>> Dan,
>>
>> +1
>>
>> But, why not for 2.0.1? That will give users less time to establish
>> solid scores before we go up and change it on them.
>>
>> casey
>
> Casey makes a good point there.  +1  (I don't think users will notice,
> in any case, unless we point it out.)

i'm gonna agree---since this changes the value of scores relative to  
other scores, i think doing this as early as possible is a good idea.

leo

---
Leo Franchi				(650) 704 3680
Tufts University 2010

lfranchi at kde.org
leonardo.franchi at tufts.edu