A better default scoring script for Amarok 2

[Jeff Mitchell]

Casey Link wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Dan Meltzer
> <parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Karthik Periagaram
>> <karthikp at gatech.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Me again. Here are the three changes that need to be made to the codebase to
>>> improve the default scoring algorithm.
>> Hi,
>>
>> I support this change for 2.1 (I was the one who told him to mail it
>> in originally).
>>
>> I think this is a nicer algorithym, but I'm not quite sure whether or
>> not the masses will be up in arms if their scoring algorthym changes
>> (will they even notice?)
>> Dan,
> 
> +1
> 
> But, why not for 2.0.1? That will give users less time to establish
> solid scores before we go up and change it on them.
> 
> casey

Casey makes a good point there.  +1  (I don't think users will notice,
in any case, unless we point it out.)

--Jeff