extragear/multimedia/amarok/src

Maximilian Kossick mkossick at gmx.de
Tue Oct 2 14:27:04 CEST 2007


Do we actually want to support sharing a database?  i know that we can't 
prevent our users from doing that if we continue to support mysql or 
postgres. We still have to decide which databases we are going to support in 
2.0.

On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Tobias G. Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007, 10:53, Maximilian Kossick wrote:
> > Isn't the current playlist supposed to be stored in the db anyway?
>
> Would that mean that multiple clients sharing the same database (e.g. via
> MySQL) always had the same playlist? Is that intended?
>
> Bye
> Tobias


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20071002/b92e9c49/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list