Why do we use WMA instead of ASF?

[Jeff Mitchell]

On Monday 19 November 2007, Harald Sitter wrote:
> Am Montag 19 November 2007 21:10:21 schrieb Ian Monroe:
> > I just find them calling it "ASF" puzzling though. :)
>
> Well, ASF is a container nowadays, so it makes sense to call the extension
> ASF and not WMA since it's probably able to read ASF, WMA and WMV tags.
> After all, the ogg-vorbis extension is OGG and not Vorbis.

Okay, then to keep things more easily in sync with upstream, I shall rename 
our stuff to ASF instead of WMA.

Regarding Martin's comment, does it make sense to extern it from one to the 
other, then?  And which way (I would think stable would extern from trunk).

--Jeff