Why do we use WMA instead of ASF?

[Harald Sitter]

Am Montag 19 November 2007 21:10:21 schrieb Ian Monroe:
> I just find them calling it "ASF" puzzling though. :)

Well, ASF is a container nowadays, so it makes sense to call the extension ASF 
and not WMA since it's probably able to read ASF, WMA and WMV tags. After 
all, the ogg-vorbis extension is OGG and not Vorbis.

-- 
Harald Sitter
Amarok team        Project Manager         Mail: harald at getamarok.com
amarok.kde.org     Good news everyone!     Jabber: apachelogger at kdetalk.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20071119/04c8b1dc/attachment.pgp