DataPtr vs. TrackPtr in the collection browser

[Alexandre Oliveira]

Yeah, sure, for that it makes a lot of sense.


On 5/17/07, Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu> wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Alexandre Oliveira <aleprjlists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Because for the collection model it doesn't matter what the data is.
> > As long as it knows how to extract information from it, no problem.
> > And DataPtrs are enough for that, at least for now, and makes things
> > much easier, as I don't need to handle them differently.
>
> So I'm going to implement a QList<Meta::TrackPtr>
> CollectionTreeItem::allDescendentTracks()
>
> I'll be looking for some code review when I commit the collection
> browser context menu. :)
>
> Ian Monroe
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>