Design of the contextview
Bart Cerneels
bart.cerneels at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 10:00:37 CET 2007
In the mockup the context is at least twice as wide as the browser or
the playlist, which makes sense if we are to focus on the context.
Lets say we take 175 as the default with of a ContextColumn, that
makes the contextview 525 pixels wide, which does seem a bit to
narrow.
Guess we could go for 200 pxls wide columns, which leaves 424 pixels
for the browsers and the playlist. The playlist is supposed to be
narrower, as shown in the mockup.
Not all ContextColumn have to be shown, less wide screens or
non-maximised windows could hide one column, like for instance the
lyrics.
2007/3/21, Seb Ruiz <me at sebruiz.net>:
> On 21/03/07, Bart Cerneels <bart.cerneels at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi ppl,
> >
> > I had a design of the context view in mind, here it is:
> >
> > The widgets in the context view are organised in 3 columns:
> > Left Column | center column | right column
>
> I know we discussed this, but i have to say i am still confused.
>
> Let's work on a base monitor resolution of 1024px wide.
>
> If we have:
>
> Browsers | Context View | Playlist
>
> As per the mockup design, i think it is more or less safe to assume
> each third will use equal spacing. That makes around 350px per column.
>
> If you want to split the context view into another 3 columns, that
> gives each of these columns only 110px or so worth of real estate to
> work with! I'm not sure how this is going to be enough to display the
> data you are suggesting!
>
> Seb
>
>
> --
> http://www.sebruiz.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list