API review

[Maximilian Kossick]

Yes, I am planning on having different implementations of the same API. 
SqlTrack is an implementation which, for the time being, is tightly coupled 
to CollectionDB. We'll probably need a few other implementations to replace 
MetaBundle, for example one for last.fm stream, podcasts, and possibly normal 
streams, and one for songs from a daap share, i think.

Max

On Monday 05 March 2007, Ian Monroe wrote:
> Could you explain the difference between Meta::Track and SqlTrack?
> Meta::Track is completely abstract, I don't quite get its point.
> Unless you plan on having different implementations of the same API?
>
> Ian Monroe
>
> On 3/5/07, Maximilian Kossick <mkossick at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I committed the first code for the MetaBundle replacement classes to
> > src/meta and src/collection. src/meta contains the generic header file,
> > src/collection contains the beginning of an implementation for our
> > current SQL collection backend.
> >
> > Because replacing MetaBundle is going to be a major task and will touch
> > basically all parts of Amarok, please review the API and improve/extend
> > it (it doesn't have all the features of MetaBundle yet)
> >
> > Cheers, Max



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20070306/2edccb46/attachment.pgp