contextview themeing: plasmification?

[Leo Franchi]

On 7/9/07, Jeff Mitchell <kde-dev at emailgoeshere.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 07 July 2007, Leo Franchi wrote:
> > note to all: my amarok was unusably slow, which was a reason for my
> desire
> > to change,  but it runs WAAY faster in a native kde4 environment (nested
> > Xephyr) rather than in kde3 as i was testing. so, the speed issue is
> more
> > moot than i thought.
> >
> > leo
> >
> > p.s. if you're not running it in a full kde4 environment, i suggest you
> > try, plasma + amarok +everything else is much much faster
>
> Thanks for the awesome tip...I see a huge speedup here too when running
> nested
> with Xephyr.  No wonder plasma guys never have speed issues, they're
> probably
> all doing this.
>
> The animations and fading with the GraphicItem(Scaler/Fader) look *much*
> better this way.  I'm interested in seeing how this affects markey and
> sebr's
> experiences with the animation.


just a thought, but if we end up plasmifying our context view (work in
progress as we speak) we could use Phase instead of our (your) own custom
scalers/faders. what do you think? anyway, that remains to be seem pending
if the plasmified context view works/looks good. expect it soon though.

--Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>



-- 
______________________________________________________
Leo Franchi                    angel666 at myrealbox.com
4305 Charlemagne Ct         lfranchi at gmail.com
Austin                                 cell: (650) 704 3680
TX, USA                              home: (650) 329 0125
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20070709/df71cde1/attachment.html