GPL v3

[Richard Hartmann]

>
> My opinion on licenses is that they are a pain in the ass. Consistent
> licensing was actually one of Shuttleworth's 13 points. I think
> consistency with the rest of software world is more important then v2
> vs. v3 probably. So... wait and see what others do.



If all people wait for the others to go to v3..


I would be for a statement like "v2 or a later version as determined
> by the KDE e.V. foundation." I've been licensing my code v2 since I
> don't trust the FSF enough to do v2+.



Rather than doing that, I would  either try to decide within the Amarok
project or to decide for KDE as a whole.

Personally, I prefer v3, but then, I am not an Amarok developer so my
opinion should not count all that much :)


Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20070708/afec123c/attachment.html