Maliit, Plasma Active and Mer

[Thomas Pfeiffer]

On 29.05.2012 13:24, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> to be perfectly honest, there should be no further effort put into the meego
> images. effort there takes effort away from Mer, and it's like dragging two dead
> horses behind the cart :)

I understand that.
I admit I was being a bit egocentric there: I needed a working devel system on 
my Wetab in order to track the newest developments for feedback and for 
extracting HIGs. Currently, however the Mer and Meego images each have their own 
critical bugs/problems which keep me from testing central PA applications, so I 
just cried for help to get _any_ of them running, withg Meego seeming to be the 
easier one atm.
But I understand that our very limited development/bugfixing resources should be 
concentrated on one system, and that is of course Mer.

> the issues on ExoPC / WeTab should be enumerated and worked through with Mer
> developers. this will give us a "MeeGo + 1" across all targets that we can
> work with.

Makes sense, yes. And probably some of the bugs (like missing udisks, for 
example, and probably the Nepomuk-related issues as well) affect any target.
Plus I'm eager to get rid of Meego as well, since it's just... well... dead ;)
So I'll install Mer again and help analyzing the problems there (I wish I could 
also help fixing them, but I haven't gotten around to learning C++ yet).

Cheers,
Thomas