getting images together for 1.0

Marco Martin notmart at gmail.com
Wed Aug 31 15:06:50 UTC 2011


On Wednesday 31 August 2011, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
>  On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:11:23 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 15:07:06 Marco Martin wrote:
> >> a very important thing for 1.0 is the final demo image since the
> >> project
> >> mostly will be judged from the finished, ready to run system.
> > 
> > yes; and in that vein i think we need to shift from thinking "demo"
> > to
> > thinking "product". we can include a set of demo configurations that
> > people
> > doing demos can put on their tablet. but the defaults ought to be for
> > actual
> > usage for our users .
> 
>  I'd say that 1.0 should be a "Minimum Viable Product"
>  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_viable_product) rather than a
>  demo, which means:
>  It should have what's needed to be of actual value to the user. No
>  more, no less
>  (unless we have enough time to do more).

yeah, good idea.

that couple of simple use cases would also become what they ended up marketed 
for..

Cheers,
Marco Martin


More information about the Active mailing list