[rekonq] Re: Review Request: AdBlock cleanup

[todd rme]

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Benjamin Poulain <ikipou at gmail.com> wrote:

>    This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100683/
>
> I am not a fan of listing every option. When the author of adblock add an option, we will need to update the code.
> What about just one field: hasUnsupportedOption set to true if any option is not used by the filter?
>
> Not to mention adblock already takes its share of memory. Don't forget those field will be allocated for each rule.
>
>
> - Benjamin
>

Is providing filter option support updates between official rekonq releases
a possible use-case for Aaron's synchrotron framework?  I know that would be
something down the road, but it might be worth keeping in mind when setting
up the system now.

-Todd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20110219/1498f006/attachment.htm