<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Benjamin Poulain <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ikipou@gmail.com">ikipou@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>
<div style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif"><div class="im">
<table style="border:1px #c9c399 solid" bgcolor="#f9f3c9" cellpadding="8" width="100%">
<tbody><tr>
<td>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
<a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100683/" target="_blank">http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100683/</a>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<br>
</div><pre style="white-space:pre-wrap;white-space:-moz-pre-wrap;white-space:-pre-wrap;white-space:-o-pre-wrap;word-wrap:break-word">I am not a fan of listing every option. When the author of adblock add an option, we will need to update the code.
What about just one field: hasUnsupportedOption set to true if any option is not used by the filter?
Not to mention adblock already takes its share of memory. Don't forget those field will be allocated for each rule.</pre>
<br>
<p>- Benjamin</p></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Is providing filter option support updates between official rekonq releases a possible use-case for Aaron's synchrotron framework? I know that would be something down the road, but it might be worth keeping in mind when setting up the system now.<br>
<br>-Todd<br></div></div>