[Ktechlab-devel] Source repository: git or mercurial or other?

[Jason Lucas]

I'm getting an invalid security certificate with that link julian.

Jason

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 21:36 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2009 20:45:54 P Zoltan wrote:
> > Good, so this question is cleared.
> > Should I enable the git now?
> I'm in. The sf.net wiki says, default repo-name will be like the project's 
> unix groupname. I guess, ktechlab that is. We should use this one as upstream, 
> since every user might at first try the standard configuration.
> 
> As I told you, I already synced my repository against SVN. I think this is 
> ready to go upstream as it is. (Since I never changed a thing to any of these 
> branches). Have a look here:
> https://krtek.asta.uni-luebeck.de/repos/KTechLab/
> There you can see 3 branches. Master is the branch representing SVN trunk and 
> ktechlab-0.3.7 obviously represents SVN branches/ktechlab-0.3.7. Since there 
> is no real 0.3.6 branch in SVN, I didn't copy more. There are 2 special 
> branches, that have not been in use for 2 years and the other one 20month, I 
> know that at least one of them isn't needed any longer ;) I also tagged the 
> 0.3.6 release commit, but haven't done so for 0.3.7.
> 
> I think, the kde4-playground branch should not be upstream (I commited some 
> crap for testing purposes). I'll come up with a better one, based on master, 
> to provide a starting point for porting.
> 
> bye then
> julian
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel at lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel