[Ktechlab-devel] Death to QT container classes!!

[Axel Jäger]

Why not kill the dependency to Qt at all? Face the fact that you are  
using the Qt toolkit and when you decide to do so, you should use as  
much as possible from that framework in order get maximum benefit.


Am 04.05.2009 um 22:40 schrieb Alan Grimes:

> QT container classes aren't necessarily a missfeature but they're
> certainly redundant to STL classes. What really is bad though is that
> the QT container classes we do use are heavily missused. Most
> notoriously the class QValueList is frequently missused as set class.
> When this is done, there is a ton of other extremely slow, buggy code
> that enforces the set property on the list...
>
> We can do much better by converting everything to the most appropriate
> STL class (which might be completely different from the current QT
> container!) and exploiting the standard algorithm packages to exploit
> the exceptionally good code there.
>
> I've done some of these conversions in the past, in the most egregious
> cases, I just did a few more.
>
> Here are some tips:
>
>>>> Work on private variables first.
>>>> work on classes low in the inheritance heirarchy.
>
>
> -- 
> New president: Here we go again...
> Chemistry.com: A total rip-off.
> Powers are not rights.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations
> Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of
> expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry
> leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code  
> vel09scf
> and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf
> _______________________________________________
> Ktechlab-devel mailing list
> Ktechlab-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel