[Ktechlab-devel] simulator

[Julian Bäume]

On Monday 10 November 2008 20:43:21 Glen wrote:
> Agreed.
Me too.

> I have no idea who should be elected to head it up. Julian has admin,
> doesn't he? I'm still unsure of who has what. Should there be an election?
I'm sorry, I also don't have any admin rights :-S. I just got (as Zoltan does) 
svn write access.

> I'm not the right guy to ask about the semantics of running in both pure
> KDE3 and KDE4 environments.
>
> I'm getting more out of KDE4 atm than I was two days ago (thx,
> Lawrence!) but I don't know anything at all about developing for it.
I can help you to get into programming with the KDE4 libs. The main thing you 
need for running both, KDE3 and KDE4 apps is an installed kdelibs package.

> P Zoltan wrote:
> > On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:28:00 +0100, Glen <gcanaday at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> First things first, I think.
> >>
> >> We need a dev roadmap before we can start arguing file formats.
> >>
> >> 1. What do we want it to *do*?
> >>
> >> 2. How do we make it do what we want, and how can we leverage what we
> >> already have to make it do it sooner?
> >>
> >> We're already discussing #2 without being too sure of #1.
> >
> >    I also see a #0 problem: what about project management issues? I mean:
> > the project on sourceforge doesn't really have an admin, as jason doesn't
> > have time for this project (see the bottom of the main page of the wiki).
> > Also when do we make releases, on how many branches will we work (kde3,
> > kde4), coding standards, ...
The last weeks I've been extensively using git and it turned out to be very 
powerful when it comes into branching and merging branches, and so on. May be, 
we should set up a public repo somewhere. Each branch can be easily linked to 
a branch in an svn repository. But still no need to switch here. IMHO that is 
something everybody can decide for himself.

> >   A roadmap is definitely needed. I think we should discuss about it,
> > too.
I thought about writing something that needs to be done for the KDE4 port, but 
didn't have the time to finish it, the last days. Somehow I got much less time 
than I want to ;)

bye
julian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/ktechlab-devel/attachments/20081111/dd72e832/attachment.sig>