enhancement request?

[Per Funke]

back to my tagging question. I noticed that it looked like the description
in all the selected images ALSO will change (to the description in the
image displayed in the annotation window).
That would undo a lot of work being done before. These images already have
descriptions. So for me your tip is not a viable one, unfortunately.

About that, see the following enhancement request. (It was accepted as
such. Exactly when it will be in effect and how it will work is currently
unknown. :) :

"Per Funke
May 28, 2023, 7:17 AM
Hi! If the following doesn't exist: It would be really nice to be able to
add text to the "Description" in multiple images without changing existing
text.
...
Andreas Schleth <schleth_es at web.de>
May 30, 2023, 9:40 PM
to kphotoalbum
...
Hi Johannes,

I think Per has a valid point. In the current UI we have a dire warning when
annotating multiple images in one go - also not really nice.
If "append to" would be the default, we would not need this warning.

Per Funke
May 30, 2023, 4:58 PM
Yay!! One more!! Thank you for supporting this idea. And thank you for
adding it to the wish list!! Rome wasn't built in one day, they say."

(missing above is the acceptance itself bcs that came from another,
personal account.)

Best,
Per









On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:14 PM Andreas Schleth <schleth_es at web.de> wrote:

> Hi Per,
>
> easy:
>
> 1. select all images with "X" and display them in the thumbnail viewer
>
> 2. select all (crtl-a)
>
> 3. tag multiple images at once (crtl-2)
>
> 4. set the tag "Y"
>
> The opposite is more or less the same workflow. Except for 4.: unset "Y"
> (You mean: .."with the keywords X and Y should not have the keyword ??
> set" - the last "Y" should be "Z" or so - or the "and Y" does not make
> sense to me)
>
> bingo!
>
> Cheers, Andreas
> Am 25.07.23 um 11:42 schrieb Per Funke:
>
> (Under the assumption I didn't miss an already existing option)
> Hi!
> Sitting and cataloging images it suddenly hits me that all records adorned
> with a keyword X ought to also ought to have a keyword Y set bcs I found
> out that this is something members of a certain interest group think would
> be natural.
>
> The opposite naturally being; all the images with the keywords X and Y
> definitely should not have the keyword Y set.
>
> How do I do these operations?
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kphotoalbum/attachments/20230805/2cc1f7be/attachment.htm>