Merge Service still in use?

[Ben Cooksley]

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:47 PM Dmitry Kazakov <dimula73 at gmail.com> wrote:

> The main problem for me is that I want to have the patch merged asap, to
> be able to test/resolve issues of some other patches in combination with
> this one. That's why I just merge that without rebase-pipeline completion.
>
> Speaking truly, I'm not very happy with our 'always fast-forward merge'
> policy [0], but given GitLab doesn't provide an option to switch policy
> on-the-fly, it should be fine for now.
>

That global policy is in place for good reason - and not only because
people want a clean history.
It is also there because merge commits cannot be easily reverted and you do
not want to try reverting a merge commit (it ends very very badly - we've
had to force push repositories out of that mess before)

Cheers,
Ben


>
> [0] - this policy is good for small patches, but for bigger patchset I
> would prefer to see an explicit merge commit
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:25 AM Ben Cooksley <bcooksley at kde.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:16 PM Dmitry Kazakov <dimula73 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Ben!
>>>
>>> I think we have kind of forgotten about that. I usually build the MRs
>>> locally or check if the pipeline has succeeded for the current revision,
>>> then I just "rebase without pipeline" and do the merge. It might be that I
>>> should use the merge service for that, I'm not sure...
>>>
>>
>> That is fine. Given it doesn't seem to be too well loved i'm going to
>> decommission the service.
>>
>> The initial issues we had with it's reliability had been resolved however
>> I think that happened not too long before people stopped using it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ben
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 2:41 AM Ben Cooksley <bcooksley at kde.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've just been reviewing services we're looking after and while doing
>>>> so have noticed that Marge Bot (invent.kde.org/merge-service) doesn't
>>>> seem to have done anything for 4 months.
>>>>
>>>> As the two projects with it enabled, is this something you're still
>>>> using as it doesn't look like it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dmitry Kazakov
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Dmitry Kazakov
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20231219/76ca2d89/attachment-0001.htm>