[WebKit-devel] KDE WebKit status update [Remix]

[Dawit A.]

On Saturday 10 October 2009 11:50:00 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> On Saturday 10 October 2009 17:10:20 Michael Howell wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 October 2009 07:41:38 Urs Wolfer wrote:
> > > QNetworkAccessManager is also used by others than the webkit stuff in
> > > KDE [1]. I am not aware of a possible user of the Cookie stuff though.
> > > Are you?
> 
> Okay, I agree on this. What's about the name? KIO::CookieJar? David, what
>  do you think about this?

I think it should not be just KIO::CookieJar because it might be confused for 
the standard KDE API even though the documentation clearly states otherwise. I 
think it should be a more descriptive name as I suggested or something along 
those lines. Though KIO::AccessManager is misleading as well it has little 
chance of being confused in KIO because the naming scheme used there, 
KIO::*Job etc. The cookiejar though a simple generic name so... Anyhow, if 
KIO::CookieJar is acceptable to others, I have no real objections just 
reservations...