[kde] [Bug 333888] Quality Assurance should supersede short-term temporary and local advantages

[Uwe Dippel]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333888

--- Comment #2 from Uwe Dippel <udippel at gmail.com> ---
So I *was* right in the end! - Instead of pointing out any quality assurance;
any quality control in the KDE project, Christoph Feck suggests to continue
this discussion on "a forum or mailing list". Meaning, none such exists! So I
may discuss this on Slashdot, or Wordpress, according to him, but there is no
resource within KDE that oversees project development. 

And this would not be a bug? Is this term - and the horizon of people like
Christoph - limited to actual bugs in source code? I don't think so.
Organisational setups can be just as buggy, and the KDE project of recent is
buggy as such, when dysfunctional code is permitted to be replaced by other
dysfunctional code.

I started to call this the Heartbleed-Sympton in FOSS: Anyone can plug her
half-witted code into the core of any project of choice. This is nothing but
insanity; and it doesn't need a Theo de Raadt to point this out.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.