[Bug 227720] KDE needs better performance

usr usrrgt at gmail.com
Sat Feb 20 03:05:33 GMT 2010


https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227720





--- Comment #2 from usr <usrrgt gmail com>  2010-02-20 04:05:30 ---
Yes, you understand right. That's all issues. :-)

- I didn't meant that I don't like the menu slide animation, but you can see
that it is slow.

- Yes, system:/ isn't related with the performance, the video is a first of
this comparative:
-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpFIbYAIi9A (edited since you last visit with
minor changes)
-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Njjyzh9vRvg
I think that this KIO-slave must be ported for KDE 4.5, for better user
experience, because all things are in one site.

- I don't know if "time" command is objetive, but as you can see in the second
video, in GNOME shows less resposive time and GNOME loads the programs in less
time.

I understand that create a desktop environment KDE 4 is a hard work, but I
can't understand the reason that primary things (like performance) are in
second plane.
I was a KDE 3 user in the past, but KDE 4 forced to me to use GNOME. I like KDE
community and the desktop ideology (in GNOME, anything confuses to the user and
they doesn't implement interesting features), and KDE 4.4 is the first real
solid (but not rock) desktop for the 4 series. But, sincerely, I can't use or
recommend it because the poor performance that it has.

I hope that, as you say the performance will be the first priority for KDE 4.5,
not all people have an Intel's Core i7 CPUs.

I collaborated with KDE with money, bug reports, mockups and little icon packs
for some application to integrate non-KDE applications with KDE. I also have
KDE/Plasma T-Shirts, like a good freak :-)
I know that it's no very much, but I can't collaborate more, I am not a
developer.

I'm sorry for this big comment, and I see us again on KDE 4.5!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



More information about the Unassigned-bugs mailing list