[umbrello-devel] [umbrello] [Bug 345029] Roadmap to use model/view

[Oliver Kellogg]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345029

Oliver Kellogg <okellogg at users.sourceforge.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |okellogg at users.sourceforge.
                   |                            |net

--- Comment #3 from Oliver Kellogg <okellogg at users.sourceforge.net> ---
At https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87104#c5, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> (In reply to Oliver Kellogg from comment #4)
> > [...]
> > How would this class hierarchy view be different from the current tree view? 
> The recent tree view shows  a "package hierarchy" in the opposite to the
> derived and base classes , which would form the hierarchy.

Ah, I see.
I suppose the hierarchy would hinge on the generalization/realization
associations among classes.
OTOH, generally I feel it unsatisfactory that Umbrello lacks a representation
of the UMLAssociations in the list view.
See for example the Logical View at
http://www.uwgb.edu/breznayp/cs372/rational.htm :
Rational Rose uses a simple line for (uni and bi directional) associations.
Further, it uses a line with a solid arrow for generalization/realization, and
a dashed line for dependency.
The advantage is that this includes not only generalization/realization but all
UMLAssoication types.
The UMLAssociation can be manipulated in the tree view independent of diagrams,
for example can be moved or deleted, or a double click could open a properties
dialog for the association.
Perhaps I should open a separate wish for this?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.