[Uml-devel] [Bug 89167] support for utility classes

[Oliver Kellogg]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89167         




------- Additional Comments From okellogg users sourceforge net  2005-01-20 17:48 -------
> A class with the stereotype <<utility>> might be generated as a package
> without a tagged type in Ada.

Or as a namespace with plain (non class-member) operations, for that matter.
I'm not sure though whether the UML standard blesses such a mapping.