[Uml-devel] [Bug 110216] "new class" dialog causes crash when opening file from command line

[Alan Ezust]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110216         




------- Additional Comments From alan.ezust gmail com  2005-08-09 07:56 -------
true, It's actually only a workaround for *this* bug (which means that on 
those older files, it will behave itself), but it's a fix for another bug 
(that is, that i think umbrello should know that Qt is a namespace). If this 
bug crops up from other old .uml files which contain namespaces used in a 
certain way, then umbrello *might* pop up that dialog again, which might 
interfere with the loading process, and I plan to take a closer look at it 
myself, since I am interested in that part of the code.

But the bug is only reproducible on files created with an older version of 
umbrello, importing classes from an older version of Qt, and perhaps now 
that both versions are not really "current" it will be very difficult to 
reproduce. In fact, it is possible that it is only due to the change in file 
formats.

I just don't like that dialog popping up at me asking me obvious questions.



On 9 Aug 2005 05:45:42 -0000, Oliver Kellogg <okellogg users sourceforge net> 
wrote:
[bugs.kde.org quoted mail]
true, It's actually only a workaround for *this* bug (which means that
on those older files, it will behave itself), but it's a fix for
another bug (that is, that i think umbrello should know that Qt is a
namespace). If this bug crops up from other old .uml files which
contain namespaces used in a certain way, then umbrello *might* pop up
that dialog again, which might interfere with the loading process, and
I plan to take a closer look at it myself, since I am interested in
that part of the code.<br>
<br>
But the bug is only reproducible on files created with an older version
of umbrello, importing classes from an older version of Qt, and perhaps
now that both versions are not really "current" it will be very
difficult to reproduce. In fact, it is possible that it is only due to
the change in file formats.<br>
<br>
I just don't like that dialog popping up at me asking me obvious questions.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9 Aug 2005 05:45:42 -0000, <b class="gmail_sendername">Oliver Kellogg</b> <<a href="mailto:okellogg users sourceforge net">okellogg users sourceforge net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------<br>You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.<br><br><a href="http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110216">http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110216</a><br><br>
<br><br><br>------- Additional Comments From okellogg users sourceforge net  2005-08-09 07:45 -------<br>> Created an attachment (id=12146)
 --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12146&action=view)<br> --> (<a href="http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12146&action=view">
http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12146&action=view</a>)<br>> the fix is in<br><br>Hmm, I'd say that's a workaround not a fix.<br>Looking
at the code of main.cpp and uml.cpp, I'm still baffled that using the
command line for passing in the file name could create a different
behavior.<br>What does that tell us about robustness and trustworthiness of the code?<br></blockquote></div><br>