[Uml-devel] Re: Uml-devel digest, Vol 1 #991 - 11 msgs
heiko.nardmann at onlinehome.de
Sat Jun 19 00:56:00 UTC 2004
At least it should be first removed from any Makefile processing as far as
this might still be done.
Am Samstag, 19. Juni 2004 07:28 schrieb Brian Thomas:
> On Friday 18 June 2004 11:25 pm, umbrello-devel-request at mail.kde.org
> > What is cppwriter.* in codegenerators good for? There is
> > cppcodegenerator.* so the other one seems to be superflous, isn't it?
> Yes, the cppwriter more or less is unneeded. I had left it in the
> codegeneration directory as the newer code was less stable than the
> original. I think, at this point, they are of equal value (both have good
> and bad points which balance each other) and the older cppwriter can be
> deleted. I can do this if you want.
More information about the umbrello-devel