[Uml-devel] umbrello 1.2 compile without kdesdk

Jonathan Riddell jr at jriddell.org
Thu Sep 4 07:15:32 UTC 2003


On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 04:09:54PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:57:24PM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > > - strip down the kdesdk tarball
> > > - take the 1.1.1 tarball and apply the changes to the code from cvs
> > > 
> > > i tried version one, but the build is so integrated that it is very
> > > hard to seperate umbrello from the rest.
> > > 
> > > i would really appreciate some advice from you guys, do you have any
> > > suggstions on how to seperate the sources? do you think version2 would
> > > work?
> > 
> > Doesn't debian have a way of splitting up KDE modules?  Can't you get
> > the source package for Umbrello from the KDE CVS .deb archives at
> > opendoorsoftware and compile that on sarge?
> 
> the problem is that these binary (.deb) packages are all generated from
> a single source package (kdesdk). if i want to create an umbrello
> package i need stand-alone sources as well, or they will interfere with
> the currently existing kdesdk source package (apart from the fact that
> shipping a second kdesk source just for umbrello would be a massive
> bloat). so what i need is a umbrello-only source package. normally this
> shouldn't be too big of a problem, but the build system of kdesdk is
> pretty integrated. if i could get the kdesdk to build only parts (e.g.
> umbrello), even i most of the other parts aren't there, then everything
> would be fine...

Ah, I see.  Can't you just check out kdesdk with only Umbrello from
KDE's CVS?

kde co -l kdesdk
kde co kdesdk/umbrello
kde co kde-common
ln -s kde-common/admin kdesdk/admin

Jonathan Riddell




More information about the umbrello-devel mailing list