[Uml-devel] [Bug 55243] packages should replace folders

[Oliver Kellogg]

This brings up a related question:

Should we interpret the term "package" only in its (narrow)
programming language sense?

This would simplify automatic code import: A C++ namespace,
IDL module, Java/Ada package are directly mapped to a UML package.

OTOH, interpreting the term "package" more broadly, an associated
diagram would only be a member of the PackageWidget, not the
UMLPackage. So I guess both interpretations are viable, only the
broad interpretation might be some more work.

--Oliver


Oliver Kellogg wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>      
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55243     
> okellogg at users.sourceforge.net changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From okellogg at users.sourceforge.net  2003-10-08
>  22:13 -------
> Fixed, except for
>
> > Packages could also have diagrams associated with them. Use cases could
>  also 
> > have diagrams associated with them.
>