[Uml-devel] good news - maybe

[Andrew Sutton]

On Saturday 11 January 2003 8:25 pm, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > > so, given this, how do i/we proceed? who is interested in working on
> > > 2.0? are there any problems with what i'm proposing that i'm not aware
> > > of?
> >
> > We could maybe open the branch for 2 now (I won't do it, because I'm not
> > so familar with CVS) and try to fix the remaining problems for 1.1.
>
> I'm mostly against that since we're only a very small number of bugs away
> from a genuine 1.1 release.  I've been on my hogmanay holidays but should
> be back working in a few days.  I honestly think it won't be more than a
> week (which should make it about two :)

three if it were me ;) that sounds fair.

i'm going to start with some code today (foundation stuff). i don't know much 
about autoconf and automake so i'll need some help getting the project set up 
correctly.

andy