[Uml-devel] naming issues

[Sebastian Stein]

Robert Lemmen <robertle at semistable.com> [020912 19:49]:
> i would have to rename it. some questions:
> - what do you think of "uml-modeler"? (still generic, but better)

I would prefer "UML Modeler". Nevertheless you are right, that this is too
generic. Another idea would be "Open UML Modeler", but I don't really like
it.

> - do you have any other ideas? naming suggestion?

Maybe we should collect some ideas (I will try to find another one by
myself) and than put them on the the sf page as a survey. So let the user
decide. It's just an idea.

> - when i have to rename the package for debian alone, i will
>   make a patch that makes is easier to select a name for the software. i
>   would be happy if you could incorporate that patch into your code,
>   because it doesn't cost you anything, makes life much easier for me,
>   and offers the possibility to change the name easily for you as well.
>   would that be ok?

I would like to see the patch. I think you shouldn't change the directory
naming, because it would make a lot of work in CVS. But to change all
strings and names of output files would be great.

I the meantime everybody could do some brainstorming.

Steinchen
-- 
"Hört auf zu meckern oder geht wählen!"
22. September 2002, Wahl zum Deutschen Bundestag