TagLib's future

[Tsuda Kageyu]

Don't mind. I can reopen them any time I want.

p.s.

If we freeze the changes, I think we should freeze bug fixes too.
Now I am aware of several bugs can lead to file corruption. It would take a
few more month for us to fix them and review them thoroughly.

2015-06-24 3:45 GMT+09:00 Tsuda Kageyu <tsuda.kageyu at gmail.com>:

> Hi Sander,
>
> First, I agree with you it's good to freeze the changes at a certain point
> or just now. Many people are awaiting the next release.
>
> Certainly, I have been making a lot of pull requests that may delay the
> progress of the project. However, I don't think they have to necessarily
> merged into the next release. How about closing the non-urgent pull request
> for now? (Privately, I hope "length in milliseconds" feature be merged.)
>
> Regards,
> Kageyu
>
> 2015-06-24 3:14 GMT+09:00 Sander Jansen <s.jansen at gmail.com>:
>
>>  Kageyu,
>>
>> I think your never ending stream of pull requests have some really nice
>> changes, however it doesn't feel like it is getting us closer to any new
>> release.
>> What's holding us back from releasing the current master branch? How
>> about "feature / cleanup / refactor" freeze and just focus only on bugfixes
>> (flac id3v1 comes to mind).
>>
>> Sander
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> taglib-devel mailing list
>> taglib-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/taglib-devel
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/taglib-devel/attachments/20150624/60a2a605/attachment.html>