TagLib 1.10 BETA Released

Lukáš Lalinský lalinsky at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 07:00:28 UTC 2015

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:

> I'd personally prefer consistency that the last digit always be included
> (why treat 1.10.0 differently than say 1.10.1) ?

To answer the question, because it's not needed.

I personally prefer the simplest version number possible and this is also
how we have done it in the past. I don't have a strong reason against
1.10.0, but 1.10 just looks nicer.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/taglib-devel/attachments/20150831/d21dccc6/attachment.html>

More information about the taglib-devel mailing list