Can TagLib2.0 require C++11 or Boost?
Stephen F. Booth
me at sbooth.org
Mon Nov 18 13:19:51 UTC 2013
I understand the sentiment about not wanting to require boost as an external dependency but I think that requiring C++11 would not be a bad thing. While this would introduce a new requirements for TagLib2, I don’t consider this an external dependency in the sense of additional software required to build the library. Anyone compiling for a recent MacOS or iOS can use clang which has good support for C++11 and libc++. I’m not very familiar with Windows but from a cursory examination it seems that MS Visual Studio has some C++11 support back to version 2010 and MingW with gcc 4.8 has it all. Any modern linux distro would also support clang or gcc. TagLib already requires a working version of the C++ standard library and I think it would be worth investigating whether replacing List, Map, RefCounter, etc. with their std:: counterparts would be worthwhile. It’s possible that this would be a large change to the existing codebase without a corresponding payoff but for version 2.0 I think it’s at least worth considering.
On Monday, November 18, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Tsuda Kageyu wrote:
> Thank you for your replies.
> I decided not to make changes that entails mandatory external
> dependencies. It's certainly a bad thing as some of you says.
> taglib-devel mailing list
> taglib-devel at kde.org (mailto:taglib-devel at kde.org)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the taglib-devel