[rkward-cvs] SF.net SVN: rkward:[4239] branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff

Wed May 2 10:10:38 UTC 2012

Revision: 4239
          http://rkward.svn.sourceforge.net/rkward/?rev=4239&view=rev
Author:   tfry
Date:     2012-05-02 10:10:37 +0000 (Wed, 02 May 2012)
Log Message:
-----------
Draft some more snippets for response to the editors.

Modified Paths:
--------------
    branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff/generic_comments.txt
    branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff/specific_comments.txt

Modified: branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff/generic_comments.txt
===================================================================

--- branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff/generic_comments.txt	2012-05-02 09:48:57 UTC (rev 4238)
+++ branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff/generic_comments.txt	2012-05-02 10:10:37 UTC (rev 4239)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
------------- What's left TODO of the generic commments --------------
+------------ What's left TODO of the generic commments, or comments that we should address in our response --------------
 
 ----- (2) Code and replication materials -----
 
@@ -8,10 +8,11 @@
 packages). The version of the source packages published on
 jstatsoft.org should be under a GPL-2 license.
 
-TODO: package. Does that mean we should include 0.5.7?
--- We have added a note to the technical supplement that this is based on
-version 0.5.6 of RKWard. Some implementation details have already changed
-since then.
++++ As requested, we have included the most recent released version of RKWard
+in our submission. We placed it in the sub-directory "Code" as
+rkward-0.5.7.tar.gz. However, we wish to point out, that the article is still
+based on RKWard 0.5.6. We have added a note to this effect to the technical supplement, 
+as some implementation details have already changed since then.
 
 ----- (3) Organization of the files -----
 
@@ -20,18 +21,20 @@
 two-digit number of your submission within the volume, e.g.,
 v49i01.tex/bib/pdf.
 
-o All graphics files should be collected in a sub-directory "Figures".
-To help LaTeX find the graphics, you can simply include the line
++++ Note that we have split our article into several .tex files for easier collaborative
+editing. We have prefixed each of these files with "v49i09". Naturally, we will be
+glad to paste everything into two standalone .tex files (one for the article, one for the
+annex) if you wish. The PDF of the annex is called v49i09_annex.pdf.
 
-\graphicspath{{Figures/}}
-
-in the header of your .tex file.
-
 o All code and replication materials should be collected in a
 sub-directory "Code". The main replication file should be v49iXX.R or
 v49iXX.txt (see point (2) above), where XX is again the two-digit
 number of your submission.
 
++++ Note that we include both a .R file replicating most applicable features, and a .txt file
+providing instructions on running the replication script (i.e. inside an RKWard session), and
+on reproducing the example in Section 7 of the annex.
+
 o Please wrap all of these files into a single organized .zip (or
 .tar.gz) file. Please make sure the .zip files only contains the
 necessary files. That is, please do not include .aux, .log, etc.
@@ -93,3 +96,10 @@
 
 where the "..." fields should be replaced with the correct information
 for your submission.
+
+o All graphics files should be collected in a sub-directory "Figures".
+To help LaTeX find the graphics, you can simply include the line
+
+\graphicspath{{Figures/}}
+
+in the header of your .tex file.

Modified: branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff/specific_comments.txt
===================================================================
--- branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff/specific_comments.txt	2012-05-02 09:48:57 UTC (rev 4238)
+++ branches/jss_dec_10/final_polished/Internal_Stuff/specific_comments.txt	2012-05-02 10:10:37 UTC (rev 4239)
@@ -19,13 +19,12 @@
 TODO: check again. I think this basically translates to "Either link to the full document, or do not link to anything at all" (possibly excepting articles in press).
 -- SR 05/01/2012: Checked, we are save to give the URL of the open access papers
 
+---- Snippets for response to editor ------
 
---------- What's done (with comments if needed) ---------
-
 o Formally \cite suitable references for KDE and Qt etc. instead of
 just giving URLs in footnotes.
 
--- We have wrapped the URLs into formal citations. We have kept the remainder of the
++++ We have wrapped the URLs into formal citations. We have kept the remainder of the
 two footnotes (but merged them into a single footnote), as we believe this will help
 the casual reader to get a very basic idea about the meaning of the two terms. We hope
 this complies with your expectations.
@@ -34,9 +33,20 @@
 into the \section*{Acknowledgments}. Give only the main affiliation in
 \author{}, further affiliations can be given in the \Address{}.
 
--- We have moved the remarks as advised. To avoid confusion, the full section
++++ We have moved the remarks as advised. To avoid confusion, the full section
 "Acknowledgements" is now included in both the main paper, and the annex.
 
+o Use "$t$~test" instead of "t-Test".
+
++++ Done. However, in one RKWard menu item the spelling "t-Test" is used, and this spelling was kept for direct references to this particular menu item.
+
+o Is there an update on the publication information in Roediger et al. (2011b)
+yet? If volume/number/pages are not available yet, a doi can be supplied.
+
++++ Roediger et al. (2011b) is officialy listed in PubMed now, the DOI (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10_2011_132) however is currently broken. Therefore we referenced the PubMed URL instead
+
+--------- What's done ---------
+
 o For \cite-ing the R-GUI page of Philippe a formal BibTeX item is
 provided below.
 
@@ -72,14 +82,5 @@
 
 o UNIX -> Unix
 
-o Use "$t$~test" instead of "t-Test".
-
--- Done. However, in one RKWard menu item the spelling "t-Test" is used, and this spelling was kept for direct references to this particular menu item.
-
 o Omit the doi in the Gentleman et al. reference and the citeseer reference
 in Kim and Lutteroth.
-
-o Is there an update on the publication information in Roediger et al. (2011b)
-yet? If volume/number/pages are not available yet, a doi can be supplied.
-
--- Roediger et al. (2011b) is officialy listed in PubMed now, the DOI (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10_2011_132) however is currently broken. Therefore we referenced the PubMed URL instead
\ No newline at end of file

This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.



