[rkward-devel] reward feedback

[Thomas Friedrichsmeier]

Hi,

On Saturday 27 April 2013 11:13:47 meik michalke wrote:
> would a check (for the mere existence of the very expected R binary file) in
> RKWard's startup sequence perhaps be a better place for this? at least it
> would also grant us with an informative error message if the problem occurs
> later, like after an incompatible R upgrade.

hm. Actually, there _is_ such a test in the wrapper script. I wonder why this 
did not trigger... Will have to investigate.

Regards
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rkward-devel/attachments/20130429/023eca7e/attachment.sig>