[rkward-devel] Upcoming release, call for testing RKWard 0.5.7

[meik michalke]

hi,

am Sonntag 09 Oktober 2011 (19:29) schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> But of course that is up for discussion as well. In fact, that's
> where I think it will be particularly useful, once we have a re-desgined
> pluginmap configuration widget. Then users could finally select the
> pluginmaps we provide, individually. embedded.pluginmap and
> under_development.pluginmap would be renamed / hidden, all others would be
> visible and checked by default. After that, I think all.pluginmap (or any
> other index) will be pretty much obsolete. Do you disagree?

ok, i agree here. once pluginmaps can be checked and uncecked, i don't even 
see a pressing reason to hide any in the first place. while the mechanism is 
subject to discussion, i'd still rather have a more transparent and intuitive 
way of definig the default status of pluginmaps (checked/unchecked) than file 
names, e.g. by an XML attribute like 'default="active"' or something. if the 
<about> section will be evaluated at some point, the file must be parsed 
anyway.


viele grüße :: m.eik

[another side note: rkwarddev code can now be much more reader friendly, after 
i switched from using named options to "..." in a lot of functions, so many 
list()s aren't needed anymore]
-- 
dipl. psych. meik michalke
institut f"ur experimentelle psychologie
abt. f"ur diagnostik und differentielle psychologie
heinrich-heine-universit"at d-40204 d"usseldorf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rkward-devel/attachments/20111009/e0c78fe0/attachment.sig>