[RkWard-devel] Short feedback on outlier test

[Stefan Roediger]

Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 00:43 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 00:24, Stefan Roediger wrote:
> > I started my code clean up today and stumbled over on I forgot. NAs to
> > say it brief. Please have a look at chisq_out_test.php where I started
> > with no.omit(...). I don't like my current approach because I have to
> > write it everywhere (and I think this is stupid). But I also don't like
> > to introduce a second variable to use one for length (eval (var))) and
> > one for which(is.na(eval (var))). Suggestion?
>
> I think using that additional variable may still be the best option
> available. One added benefit is that you could also avoid a lot of the
> eval()s this way. E.g.
>
> 	for (sub in objects) {
> 		...
> 		var <- na.omit (eval (sub))
> 	}
>
> and then use var in most places, and sub (i.e. the still substituted
> variable name) only where you need the raw data. This would also make it
> easy to make removal of NAs optional. But maybe somebody else has a real
> neat idea on how to deal with this?
>
> BTW, maybe use "object" instead of "var" as a name, since you also need the
> function var(), and this might look confusing?
>
> Regards
> Thomas

okay. Thanks for the answer. I'll go through my plug-ins and change it.