Drawy 1.0.0 Release | Request for Support

[Albert Astals Cid]

El dilluns, 4 de maig del 2026, a les 13:03:00 (Hora d’estiu d’Europa 
central), Thomas Baumgart va escriure:
> All,
> 
> is it still the case that the information for apps.kde.org is
> drawn from the master branch only? 

It is.

Cheers,
  Albert

> In that case, don't forget
> to update the master branch of the metainfo file as well.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> On Montag, 4. Mai 2026 12:17:08 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Julius Künzel 
wrote:
> > Hi Prayag,
> > 
> > it is not a big deal, others did the some mistake before. Best would be to
> > do a 1.0.1 release. The metainfo file is not only relevant for Flathub,
> > but other consumers too. As soon as files are uploaded to download.k.o
> > they should not be replaced anymore.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Julius Künzel
> > KDE Developer
> > Matrix: @jlskuz:kde.org
> > KDE GitLab: https://invent.kde.org/jlskuz
> > 
> > 04.05.2026 00:29:35 Prayag Jain <prayagjain2 at gmail.com>:
> > > Hi Team,
> > > 
> > > Drawy is a new KDE whiteboard application that has approached its first
> > > release 1.0.0. I'm writing this email because of an oversight from my
> > > end during the release process.
> > > 
> > > During the release process, I used
> > > releaseme[https://invent.kde.org/sdk/releaseme] to create a tag in the
> > > git repository on invent[https://invent.kde.org/graphics/drawy] and a
> > > tarball which was just uploaded to
> > > download.kde.org[http://download.kde.org] a few hours ago
> > > (https://phabricator.kde.org/T18625). I realised that I missed an
> > > important part of the release process, which was updating the appstream
> > > metainfo file. As a result, the uploaded tarball uses an outdated
> > > version of the file which contains outdated description, no
> > > screenshots, no keywords, and no release information which are required
> > > by software repositories like FlatHub.
> > > 
> > > I deeply regret this oversight and would like to understand how I can
> > > proceed from here. Should I create a new tag *1.0.1* and upload a new
> > > tarball with the updated files or would it be better to request for the
> > > removal of the currently uploaded tarball, delete the tag, and proceed
> > > again? The first option seems like the way to go but I'm still not sure
> > > because *1.0.0* has not been announced yet.
> > > 
> > > I deeply apologize for the inconvenience caused and will appreciate your
> > > support as I'm still figuring some things out.
> > > 
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > Prayag Jain