2 kirigami fixes for a point release
David Faure
faure at kde.org
Fri Mar 20 19:37:20 GMT 2020
On vendredi 20 mars 2020 12:16:09 CET David Edmundson wrote:
> >> > Kirigami seems to be rather unstable, I wonder if anything can be done
> >> > to
> >> > improve upon that [*].
> >>
> >> One important thing seems to have been getting sloppy in those repos;
> >> mandatory code reviews.
> >> That's an easy thing to enforce, and we know it makes a huge difference
> >> to
> >> code.
> >>
> >> Even if no-one comments, the extra delay of it running on your own
> >> system delivers a lot.
> >
> >I fully agree.
> >
> >(CC'ing the developer lists)
>
> The situation with code reviews has not changed.
>
> git log --grep Differential --invert-grep --since 1.month
>
> In Kirigami is extremely disappointing, and not something we see in
> other frameworks.
Thanks for noticing (and for the nice git command line!).
I'm going to ask more directly than the other David dares doing...
@Marco, can you please start using phabricator for all your commits, so that
they get reviewed?
--
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE Frameworks 5
More information about the release-team
mailing list