Proposed reversion-in-the-tarball

David Faure faure at
Sat Dec 5 16:00:38 GMT 2020

On samedi 5 d├ęcembre 2020 16:16:01 CET Nate Graham wrote:
> Hello folks,
> I'd like to propose reverting
> 0268af50cf60470c in the kservice tarball for the upcoming Frameworks 5.77
> release. This commit is causing significant performance issues for some
> people:
> The issue is under investigation and I have confidence that it will be
> resolved soon. However this will likely not be soon enough for
> frameworks 5.77. Accordingly, I would like to propose that we revert
> that commit from the tarball to avoid shipping a regression in 5.77, but
> keep it in the repo to facilitate further debugging.
> Does this seem like a sensible idea?

OK, this makes sense.
To be extra safe I'll revert 24e081686d but also 0eccfead55.

Actually, I was able to do the reverts only in the local release branch,
so the commits are still there in master.

Here's the updated tarball:
kservice v5.77.0-rc2

Meven, let's fix this in master, we have another month :)

David Faure, faure at,
Working on KDE Frameworks 5

More information about the release-team mailing list