KDE Frameworks 5.56.0

[Luca Beltrame]

Il giorno Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:18:24 +0100
Antonio Rojas <arojas at archlinux.org> ha scritto:

> I had to backport 4bf1d0e8 too for it to apply on top of 5.56. Would
> be good if some kirigami dev could confirm whether it's OK to
> backport just those 2 commits

I talked this over with notmart on IRC:

[11:32] <notmart> hmm, not much understanding why 4bf1d0e8 is needed
[11:32] <einar77_work> notmart: backporting one introduces conflicts
[11:32] <notmart> i tought the fix for the kcm freeze was done before
tagging, meh
[11:32] <notmart> right
[11:33] <notmart> so yeah, the other one is mostly harmless
[11:33] <notmart> i guess is better to backport those two instead of
making another one ad hoc? 
[11:33] <einar77_work> I would say so

tl;dr: It should be harmless. Can we get a kirigami 5.56.1 with those
two commits in?

While we're here we might want a plasma-framework 5.56.1 with
ebae2d63033647950cf0f9d97410723a8c7db1f3 applied (which fixes a crash).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Firma digitale OpenPGP
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20190313/f8da4d69/attachment.sig>