Stopping release of kdewebdev for Applications 16.08

[Albert Astals Cid]

El dimarts, 25 d’octubre de 2016, a les 23:40:12 CET, Albert Astals Cid va 
escriure:
> El dilluns, 17 d’octubre de 2016, a les 20:31:50 CEST, Nicolás Alvarez va
> 
> escriure:
> > 2016-10-06 19:44 GMT-03:00 Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org>:
> > > El dimecres, 5 d’octubre de 2016, a les 22:06:22 CEST, Ben Cooksley va
> > > 
> > > escriure:
> > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Luigi Toscano
> > >> <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it>
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > >> > Albert Astals Cid ha scritto:
> > >> >> El dimecres, 13 de juliol de 2016, a les 1:27:21 CEST, Albert Astals
> > >> >> Cid
> > >> >> va
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> escriure:
> > >> >>> El divendres, 8 de juliol de 2016, a les 11:50:44 CEST, Andreas
> > >> >>> Sturmlechner>>>
> > >> >>> 
> > >> >>> va escriure:
> > >> >>>> On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 11:11, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > >> >>>>> On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > >> >>>>>> None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits
> > >> >>>>>> in
> > >> >>>>>> years.
> > >> >>>>>> They should probably be converted to git, still, but imo no need
> > >> >>>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>> keep
> > >> >>>>>> it releasing.
> > >> >>>>> 
> > >> >>>>> Some of them could be probably dropped, but also isn't it
> > >> >>>>> possible
> > >> >>>>> that
> > >> >>>>> they slipped out of the radar because not on git? Would it be
> > >> >>>>> possible
> > >> >>>>> to
> > >> >>>>> have them converted first and see if this changes?
> > >> >>>> 
> > >> >>>> kommander and kfilereplace are not actually webdev related, so
> > >> >>>> could
> > >> >>>> be
> > >> >>>> moved into other categories (kdeutils?) if not dropped.
> > >> >>>> 
> > >> >>>> Not sure how many people still do image maps (so chances this will
> > >> >>>> be
> > >> >>>> picked up again are slim), and klinkstatus still depends on
> > >> >>>> kdepimlibs-4
> > >> >>>> to build.
> > >> >>> 
> > >> >>> Let's move them to git first and then decide if we want to drop
> > >> >>> them
> > >> >>> or
> > >> >>> not.
> > >> >>> 
> > >> >>> Given the freeze for KDE Applications 16.08 is like in 2 days i
> > >> >>> would
> > >> >>> not
> > >> >>> rush for now, let's all make a note for 2.5 months and decide if we
> > >> >>> want
> > >> >>> to
> > >> >>> release them for KDE Applications 16.12.
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> So it's 2.5 months later now.
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> I would like to get them moved to git if possible, get them released
> > >> >> for
> > >> >> KDE Applications 16.12 and tell people they need to start caring
> > >> >> about
> > >> >> them if they don't want to see them dropped for 17.04
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> Now the question is, how do we get them into git?
> > >> > 
> > >> > I think that sysadmins have (or had) a system dedicated to SVN-to-git
> > >> > conversion, and also the examples of the old conversions. There are
> > >> > some
> > >> > instructions here:
> > >> > https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MoveToGit/UsingSvn2Git
> > >> 
> > >> We had such a system - all such machines have since been shutdown
> > >> though.
> > >> I think Nicolas has a container on one of our machines which he does
> > >> the occasional conversion which gets requested in, but it has been a
> > >> long time since that was last used if I recall correctly.
> > > 
> > > Any way i can get that 65G svn file somehow or we can't port anything
> > > else
> > > from svn to git?
> > > 
> > > Or Nicolás can I convince you to git-ify kdewebdev?
> > 
> > It's done! Please review:
> > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kfilereplace
> > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kimagemapeditor
> > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-klinkstatus
> > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kommander
> 
> I don't think much changes happened but the branches from
> https://websvn.kde.org/branches/Applications/
> are missing (i.e. you only have the KDE/XXX ones), would it be much work to
> get them in?

Ping?

> 
> Cheers,
>   Albert
> 
> > The history seems to be complete, but I haven't tested if the latest
> > master compiles etc. I think they rely on the global
> > kdewebdev/CMakeLists.txt and don't build standalone.
> > 
> > I also need to know where to push the final git repos. Should I create
> > a kdewebdev module in repo-metadata? And what needs to be done with
> > i18n for a svn->git move?