Review Request 125544: Fix limit/offset handling when sort option is no sort.
Xuetian Weng
wengxt at gmail.com
Fri Oct 9 17:09:25 UTC 2015
> On Oct. 9, 2015, 11:21 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > src/lib/searchstore.cpp, line 114
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125544/diff/1/?file=410212#file410212line114>
> >
> > The entire code in this else case is absolutely rubbish. The person implementing it should feel bad (me).
> >
> > We seem to be completly ignoring the offset over here.
Ah, you're right..
- Xuetian
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125544/#review86535
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Oct. 9, 2015, 11:21 a.m., Xuetian Weng wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125544/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Oct. 9, 2015, 11:21 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Baloo, Release Team and Vishesh Handa.
>
>
> Repository: baloo
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> The bug is obvious, old code uses limit instead of (limit > 0), which gracefully handles limit < 0 case (means everything).
>
> After offset is introduced, limit < 0 case is not handled properly.
>
> This patch contains following changes:
> 1. make offset uint, m_offset is uint in Query already.
> 2. handle limit < 0 case properly.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/lib/searchstore.h 17b4263
> src/lib/searchstore.cpp a2e7749
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125544/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> baloosearch:/ doesn't return anything because of this, now it properly returns result.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Xuetian Weng
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20151009/68c9eb53/attachment.html>
More information about the release-team
mailing list