Future frameworks releases

[Alexander Potashev]

2015-06-18 0:01 GMT+03:00 Kevin Ottens <ervin at kde.org>:
> Bear with me I'll be partly acting from memory here... let's see something
> like:
>  1) KF5 releases are numbered YYYY.MM;
>  2) Individual frameworks are numbered 5.N, N being incremented only if
> there's been commits since the last KF5 release;
>
> [*] Note that IMO, that tuning should not involve going toward 5.N.M version
> scheme. The 5.N only scheme was intentional and debated quite a bit already.
> It's intentional to have a combination of very short cycles and feature +
> bugfix on each releases. Packagers were skeptic about it but it's been proven
> to work now.

Hi Kevin,

5.N.M numbering (or even X.N.M) is what Christian requested in the first place.

Probing question: If I translate one string in kcoreaddons5_qt.po into
Belarusian language, should we bump and release a new version of
KCoreAddons because of that?

-- 
Alexander Potashev